PASTIC Dspace Repository

Discourse on Nuclear Weapons post-9/11 and Rogue States Narrative

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khan, Umar Farooq
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-07T11:21:25Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-07T11:21:25Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1000
dc.description.abstract Narrative construction plays an important role in the creation of national security policies. The rogue state narrative has been an important part of the conceptualisation and presentation of the security policies of the West. This became more pronounced after the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, which presented certain ‘rogue’ actors as a threat to the security of the international community. A relevant case study in this regard is the possession of nuclear weapons which has been deemed a risk in the hands of such proscribed ‘rogue states.’ This paper will analyse this assertion through the prism of Kant’s seminal work on Democratic Peace Theory which asserts that democracies seldom go to war due to their inherent peaceful tendencies of democracies. Furthermore, the study will look at criticisms of the theory from different theoretical paradigms of international relations. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher IPRI Journal en_US
dc.subject Democratic Peace Theory en_US
dc.subject Kant en_US
dc.subject Nuclear Weapons en_US
dc.subject Rogue States en_US
dc.subject Social Sciences en_US
dc.title Discourse on Nuclear Weapons post-9/11 and Rogue States Narrative en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account