dc.description.abstract |
Six wheat cultivars/lines viz; Baviacore, Nesser, 9247, 9252, 9258 and 9267 were crossed
following complete diallel technique. The seed of F 1 crosses and parents was planted in
the experimental area of Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of
Agriculture, Faisalabad. Planting was done under normal and water stress conditions
following randomized complete block design with three replications in both of the cases.
The data was recorded on ten guarded plants tagged for the purpose for each parent and
cross in each replication under both of the conditions. The traits like plant height,
peduncle length, specific flag leaf area, specific flag leaf weight, stomatal frequency
(upper flag leaf surface), size of stomata, days to heading, number of spikes per plant,
spike density, number of grains per spike, 100-grain weight, biological yield, grain yield
and harvest index were recorded on tagged plants in each replication. The recorded data
were subjected to the analysis of variance technique to determine the genotypic
differences for the traits which were exhibited highly significant under both of the water
availability conditions. Combining ability and gene action analysis was carried out for all
of the parameters studies. Significant change in the mean performance of all the
characters was observed under the water stress condition. Additive gene action was
obtained in the characters like plant height, peduncle length, stomatal frequency, size of
stomata, days to heading, spike density, and 100-grain weight when evaluation was made
using Griffing’s approach while the characters like plant height, peduncle length,
stomatal frequency, size of stomata, days to heading, spike density, 100-grain weight,
biological yield and grain yield was observed when calculations were done using
Hayman’s approach under irrigated condition. Non-additive gene action was exhibited in
the characters like specific flag leaf area, specific flag leaf weight, number of spikes per
plant, number of grains per spike, biological yield, grain yield and harvest index through
the use of Griffing’s approach and over dominance in the characters like specific flag leaf
area, specific flag leaf weight, number of spikes per plant and harvest index when
Hayman’s approach was used for calculations under irrigated condition. The results under
water stress conditions revealed that gene action exhibited in the characters like peduncle
length, stomatal frequency, size of stomata, days to heading, spike density and 100-grain
weight was additive when Griffing’s approach for analysis was adopted while using the
1analysis though Hayman’s approach, additive gene action was shown by the characters
like peduncle length, stomatal frequency, size of stomata, days to heading, spike density,
biological yield and grain yield. The characters like plant height, specific flag leaf area,
specific flag leaf weight, number of spikes per plant, number of grains per spike,
biological yield, grain yield and harvest index gave non-additive gene action in Griffing’s
approach and plant height, specific flag leaf area, specific flag leaf weight, number of
spikes per plant, 100-grain weight and harvest exhibited over dominance in Hayman’s
approach under water stress conditions. Similar gene action was shown by both
calculations i.e. Griffing’s as well as Hayman’s approach for most of the characters under
irrigated as well as water stress conditions except number of grains per spike, biological
and grain yield under irrigated and biological and grain yield under water stress
conditions. The difference of results might be due to the reason that means were used in
calculation by the numerical approach while variances in graphical approach. Multi
disciplinary approach involving plant breeding, genetics, biotechnology, physiology, soil
and crop management for the development of water stress tolerant/ resistant genotypes in
wheat, is suggested. |
en_US |