Abstract:
Approval from Ethical Review Committee (ERC) has often been considered a challenge
by researchers. Regular evaluation of ERC procedures has been recommended globally. We have
evaluated working of ERC at Foundation University by identifying gaps between ERC and researchers
with the vision to improve the efficiency of the committee. Methods: A cross sectional study was
conducted, after permission from president ERC. We developed a structured feedback proforma with
20 questions regarding application form, its processing and over all experience of researchers. A total of
65 volunteer faculty members who had ever applied to ERC for approval, participated in study. A
descriptive analysis was done using spreadsheets. Results: Out of 65 volunteers, 41 returned and
completed the proforma. More than 50% (n=24) respondents considered application form was simple to
comprehend, however, 40% (n=17) agreed that ERC should provide assistance in its completion. The
good majority received final approval letter within one month of application however almost none
received proper acknowledgement of receipt and notification of time taken for review. Two third
participants (66%, n=27) showed confidence in ERC decisions. Improvement in communication
between ERC and researchers through IT support was suggested. Conclusions: Researchers agreed that
ERC at Foundation University with its limited resources was fulfilling its role of timely review process
and showed confidence in its decisions. The communication lack between ERC and researchers was
considered major weakness.
