PASTIC Dspace Repository

Asymptomatic Bacterurea in Pregnancy, its Prevalence among Asymtomatic Patient with more Thans 5 Pus Cell on Microscopy and its Obsterical Outcome in Early Vs Late Detected Group

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author SAEED, SHAZIA
dc.contributor.author AKTHER, NASREEN
dc.contributor.author SABIR, FARZANA
dc.contributor.author AHMAD, ASHFAQ
dc.contributor.author AKRAM, SARA
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-24T06:31:43Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-24T06:31:43Z
dc.date.issued 2017-12
dc.identifier.citation SAEED, S., AKTHER, N., & SABIR, F. Asymptomatic Bacterurea in Pregnancy, its Prevalence among Asymtomatic Patient with more Thans 5 Pus Cell on Microscopy and its Obsterical Outcome in Early Vs Late Detected Group. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1996-7195
dc.identifier.uri http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13561
dc.description.abstract Background: Routine urine cultur in pregnancy is costly and may not practically possible on all pregnant patient in poor resource countries so if appropriate selection of patients after routine microscopy done it may reduce burden of diseases as well as cost effective. Aim: To determin the prevalence, the most common causative organism and obstertircal outcome in term of preeclamptic toxaemia (PET), preterm labour and preterm premature rupture membrane (PPROM) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in asymptomatic bacterurea in early verses late deteced group. Place and Duration. This study was conducted in Divisional Headquarter Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Mirpur Azad Jamu Kashmir from Ist January 2017 to Ist January 2018. Methodology: This is a prospective cohohrt study. Total 100 pregnant women were selected for urine culture having WBC >5 per high field on microscopic examination. 50 patients in early detected group (Group A) before 23 weeks of gestation verses late detected group (Group B) between 30 to 34 weeks gestation after exclusion criteria. Treatment given according to sensitivity report. They were followed till delievery and incidence of preterm, PPROM symptomatic UTI and PET were recorded in these two group. Results: In early detected group asymptomatic bacterurea (ASB) was found in 7 out of 50 patients (14%) and no significant difference in incidence of preterm labour PPROM and PET in ASB positives verses ASB negative women. In second group it was found in 9 out of 50 (18%) cases with significant increase in preterm and PET PPROM inspite of giving treatment. Conclusion: Prevalence of ASB is high. Early detection and treatment will reduce incidence of preterm labour, PPROM and PET with ASB positive women so it should be included in routine aninatal care for best fetomaternal outcome. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences en_US
dc.subject Urinary tract infection en_US
dc.subject Asymptomatic bacterurea en_US
dc.subject Midstream urine for culture sensitivity en_US
dc.subject Preterm labour en_US
dc.subject Pyelonephrites en_US
dc.subject PET en_US
dc.title Asymptomatic Bacterurea in Pregnancy, its Prevalence among Asymtomatic Patient with more Thans 5 Pus Cell on Microscopy and its Obsterical Outcome in Early Vs Late Detected Group en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account