PASTIC Dspace Repository

Comparing efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus pemetrexed in lung cancer: A preliminary clinical trial evaluating effect of inflammatory biomarkers on disease progression

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yao, Yuanshan
dc.contributor.author Zhou, Yinjie
dc.contributor.author Hua, Qingwang
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-06T03:27:34Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-06T03:27:34Z
dc.date.issued 2019-05-03
dc.identifier.citation Yao, Y., Zhou, Y., & Hua, Q. (2019). Comparing efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus pemetrexed in lung cancer: A preliminary clinical trial evaluating effect of inflammatory biomarkers on disease progression. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 32. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1011-601X
dc.identifier.uri http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/14671
dc.description.abstract This pilot clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus pemetrexed in Chinese patients with early stage of lung cancer. Also, the effect of inflammatory biomarkers on disease progression among Lung cancer patients who received regorafenib versus pemetrexed was evaluated in the present study. The patients who were diagnosed with early stage of lung cancer were enrolled. The eligible participants were randomized to receive regorafenib 160 mg (orally once daily for the first 21 days of each 28-day cycle) plus BSC or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously (Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. beginning 30 minutes after pemetrexed administration) plus BSC in a 1:1 ratio. Efficacy measures such as overall survival, progression-free survival and overall response were assessed after regorafenib and pemetrexed treatment. Safety of after regorafenib and pemetrexed treatment was also assessed. Blood was collected into a test tube pre-washed with chilled EDTA tubes, and then centrifuged to collect plasma sample for estimation of inflammatory biomarkers of interest. Survival time in respect to disease progression was also assessed. Also, biomarker assessments were made at each visit, to see whether inflammatory biomarker has any specific role on survival or in predicting progression of lung cancer. The present study results show that the safety and efficacy profile of regorafenib and pemetrexed was found similar in Chinese patients with early stage lung cancer. In general, regorafenib and pemetrexed treatment was well tolerated in Chinese patients with early stage Lung cancer. The results of this pilot study showed that inflammatory biomarkers such as interleukin 6 and interleukin 17A play an important role predicting progression of early stage lung cancer among Chinese patients. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Karachi: Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Karachi en_US
dc.subject Regorafenib en_US
dc.subject pemetrexed en_US
dc.subject Chinese en_US
dc.subject early stage of lung cancer en_US
dc.subject inflammatory biomarkers en_US
dc.title Comparing efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus pemetrexed in lung cancer: A preliminary clinical trial evaluating effect of inflammatory biomarkers on disease progression en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account