Clinical and histopathological comparative study of two equine-derived bone graft: a human study

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of collagenated bone graft substances with different collagen ratios after sinus floor augmentation. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted at Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, from September 2011 to September 2013. Sinus floor augmentation was done with two different equinederived xenografts in patients before dental implant application. Of the two randomised groups, one was treated with 100% collagenated bone mix (Group A), and the other half with 90% collagenated bone mix + 10% collagen gel (Group B).Six months after sinus augmentation, prior to dental implant surgery, a specimen was taken from the implant socket with trephine drill for histopathological evaluation of new bone, connective tissue and residual graft material at each augmented site. SPSS 19 was used for data analysis. Results: Of the 19 patients, 12(63%) were females and 7(37%) were males. The overall mean age was 51.68±11,96 years (range: 24-69 years). A total of 30 sinus floor augmentations were done. New bone formation was significantly better in Group A(15 sinus floor augmentation) than in Group B (the other 15 sinus floor augmentation) (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in connective tissue formation and residual graft materials between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Collagenated bone mix was found to be a suitable graft material for sinus floor augmentation, but increased collagen ratio did not improve new bone formation over the 6-month healing process.