Abstract:
The contemporary emerging security trends seem destined to
marginalising the potential and legitimacy of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. The transformation in the international settings have
modified state actors’ behaviour at the domestic level and resultantly,
states have started orienting themselves to a changed environment
contrary to the set non-proliferation norms. This study investigates some
pertinent questions: why was the regime created in the first place? What
are the problems attached to the regime and how have emerging trends
further undermined the scope and role of this regime? Why is the regime
important for the future security environment? What could possibly
happen if the regime is not made effective with renewed realisable
objectives? The study asks why there is an urgent need to establish a
stringent norm against proliferation of nuclear weapons and make it
consistent with emerging realities. This study concludes that most of the
non-proliferation problems from the outset are associated with the
structure of this regime and considered as a system level interplay
(politics at the level of major powers) due to states’ relative interests.
Thus, it has been argued that the most powerful component, the linchpin of
this regime such as the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), demands
structural revision, thereby reinforcing the remaining arrangements
within the regime in the present security order. The revised structure of
the regime and states’ modified behaviour at the system level will only
secure the legitimacy and spirit of this regime.
