PASTIC Dspace Repository

RELIABILITY OF A DIRECT OBSERVATIONAL TOOL TO ASSESS CLINICAL REASONING (DOT-CR)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author TABASSUM NAVEED
dc.contributor.author NAVEED MAZHAR BHATTI
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-13T07:00:24Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-13T07:00:24Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06-23
dc.identifier.citation Naveed, T., & Bhatti, N. (2017). RELIABILITY OF A DIRECT OBSERVATIONAL TOOL TO ASSESS CLINICAL REASONING (DOT-CR). Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 37(2), 302-305. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1012-8700
dc.identifier.uri http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/18495
dc.description.abstract Medical students are usually left to learn clinical reasoning in the clinical years with direct patient interaction. Research evidence shows that the skill can be learned in preclinical years by employing paper case based methods of teaching without actual patient interaction. A direct observational tool to assess clinical reasoning was developed after literature search in consultation with and by receiving feedback from educationalists. Cronbach alpha reliability of the tool was excellent at 0.92. Interrater reliability by t-test showed lack of agreement between two raters. The tool is reliable, useful and feasible. Further studies can be carried out on its validity and utility. Regular training of raters with timely feedback is required to improve interrater reliability en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Islamabad: Prof Ahmad Iqbal for Pakistan Society for Promotion of Oral & Dental Research en_US
dc.subject Assessment tool en_US
dc.subject Case based learning en_US
dc.subject Clinical reasoning en_US
dc.subject Script theory and assessment tool en_US
dc.title RELIABILITY OF A DIRECT OBSERVATIONAL TOOL TO ASSESS CLINICAL REASONING (DOT-CR) en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account