PASTIC Dspace Repository

FLEXURAL STRENGTH EVALUATION OF TETRIC EVOCERAM BULK- FILL COMPOSITE IN COMPARISON WITH TRADITIONAL COMPOSITES

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author ALI A RAZOOKI AL-SHEKHLI
dc.contributor.author ISRA'A AL AUBI
dc.contributor.author ABDUL RAHMAN AYMAN
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-13T07:07:40Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-13T07:07:40Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06-29
dc.identifier.citation Al-Shekhli, A. A. R., & Ayman, A. R. (2017). Flexural strength evaluation of tetric evoceram bulk-fill composite in comparison with traditional composites. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 37(2), 347-350. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1012-8700
dc.identifier.uri http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/18506
dc.description.abstract Flexural strength is one of the most significant test to evaluate mechanical performance of dental restorative materials because it combines compression, tension and shear stresses. These stresses will affect the restoration during mastication in a great similarity to the real oral situation. Many brands of Bulk-fill composites are being introduced to the dental market in the last few years which enable the dentist to place a restoration of 4 mm in thickness as a single composite increment. It's important to test the flexural strength of bulk-fill composites to have an idea about their clinical performance in the oral cavity and consequently the durability of the restoration. This study was designed to evaluate flexural strength values of Tetric EvoCeram bulk-fill composite in comparison with three different traditional composites.This study investigates the flexural strength of four different composites with A3 shade: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk fill (Ivoclar-Vivadent), Nanoceram-Bright (DMP), Ceram.X one (Dentsply), Estelite Sigma Quick (Tokuyama Dental). Ten samples from each composite material were prepared in a metal mold with dimensions of 2 mm x 2 mm x 25 mm and were photo-cured for 20 seconds. The samples were in a bar shape of the same mold dimensions. Flexural strength was evaluated by three-point bending test using universal testing machine after incubation of the samples in 37°C saline for 24 hours. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test at 5% level of significance.One-way ANOVA test revealed that, there was a statistically significant difference between the four composite groups being tested (P≤0.05). The highest mean flexural strength value was obtained for NANOCERAM-BRIGHT (116.75 MPa) followed by Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (116.09 MPa), CERAM.X ONE (101.12 MPa) and ESTELITE SIGMA QUICK which exhibited the lowest mean flexural strength value (97.40 MPa).It was concluded that composition of dental composite materials significantly affects their flexural strength. Composites with higher fillers content will have better flexural strength. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill successfully passed the flexural strength test and can serve clinically as a successful posterior restoration. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Islamabad: Prof Ahmad Iqbal for Pakistan Society for Promotion of Oral & Dental Research en_US
dc.subject Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill en_US
dc.subject flexural strength en_US
dc.subject Bulk-Fill en_US
dc.subject Composite Resin en_US
dc.subject Dental composites en_US
dc.title FLEXURAL STRENGTH EVALUATION OF TETRIC EVOCERAM BULK- FILL COMPOSITE IN COMPARISON WITH TRADITIONAL COMPOSITES en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account