Abstract:
Geotechnical characterization of soils for its use in any project is conducted through a
programme that comprises in-situ and laboratory tests. The main in-situ tests include
pressuremeters (PMT), Dilatometer (DMT), Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone
Penetrometer (CPT). Among these, prebored pressuremeter tests are performed in pre-
drilled boreholes. The drilling methods such as hand augering and rotary drilling rig are
recommended by the ASTM D-4719 for the prebored pressuremeter testing. The vertical
and constant diameter boreholes are the basic requirement for the prebored pressuremeter
testing to obtain quality tests curves. The verticality and constant diameter for the
boreholes are difficult to be achieved by these two methods as the hand auger has no
control on the vertical movement and rotary rig induces vibrations to the walls of the
borehole during rotation of the bit.
A cost effective mechanical drilling system (MDS) has been developed locally for the
drilling of vertical and constant diameter shallow boreholes to about 10 m depth. The
prebored pressuremeter test curves obtained in boreholes drilled by the MDS, hand auger
and rotary rig were compared and found that the quality of the test curves obtained in
boreholes drilled by the MDS was better than the hand auger and rotary rig.
The site selected for the detailed study comprised alluvial soils (CL-ML and ML). In
addition to prebored PMT testing, field testing comprised, SPT, CPT and laboratory
testing included Triaxial testing, Resonant Column along with classification tests.
The sophisticated laboratory testing like resonant column tests, isotropically consolidated
undrained (CIU) and isotropically consolidated drained (CID) triaxial tests with unload-
reload loops were conducted for the determination of shear modulus of soils. The unload,
reload and unload-reload shear moduli from triaxial unload-reload tests were compared
with those determined from pressuremeter tests. The correlations of geotechnical
parameters obtained from laboratory testing and in-situ testing have been established.
The precise determination of the in-situ horizontal stress is difficult by the traditional
prebored PMT testing technique. A new technique has been developed for the estimation
of in-situ horizontal stress keeping in mind the least disturbance/relaxing of the in-situ
stresses.