Abstract:
Platelet flow cytometry is an emerging tool in diagnostic and
therapeutic hematology. It is eminently suited to assess the expression of
platelet surface receptors both qualitatively as well as quantitatively. It can
thus serve as a useful parameter for in vivo expression of platelet activation
and thus fore-warn the risk of thromboembolism which is inherent in
patients with untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This technique can also be used to study and compare the effect of
various antiplatelet drugs on the level of platelet activation and to establish
any dose-effect relationship of these drugs. Topographical localization of
platelet granules and study of platelet-platelet and platelet-leukocyte
interaction is also possible by this procedure. All these parameters serve as
pointers towards the presence of activated platelets in the circulation with
its thromboembolic consequences.
This technique can also be put to therapeutics by assessing the effect
of varying doses of clopidogrel on suppressing platelet activation. It can
thus serve as a reliable and easy technique to determine the dose of various
antiplatelet drugs and offer a custom-made protective antithrombotic
therapy.
This study was undertaken with the primary object of determining
platelet reactivity in patients with untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus and to
study the effect of clopidogrel administration on the state of in vivo platelet
XIactivation in these patients. It was extended to include the effect of
clopidogrel on reactive platelet CD markers after in vitro pre-treatment with
platelet agonists, more specifically ADP. This agonist was selected because
of its easy handling and predicable platelet stimulating effect.
It was postulated that platelets in patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus circulate in the blood in hyperactive state and predispose to
thrombotic complications so frequently encountered in these patients.
This study confirms that platelets in these patients are at a higher
state of reactivity and that clopidogrel can effectively suppress the
enhanced platelet response.
Four CD markers were chosen for this study; of these four markers
CD63 and CD62p have a linear relationship with heightened platelet
reactivity. The other two markers i.e. CD41 and CD61 are unaffected in
these patients and do not seem to be causally related to increased
propensity to develop athero-thrombotic complications in patients with type
2 diabetes mellitus. Sequential study of the reactive CD markers i.e. CD63
and CD62p shows that CD63 hyperactivity as indicated by flourescine
positivity is a constant and persistent change while that of CD62p is an
unstable response which falls off with the passage of time.
It is therefore concluded that CD63 platelet markers should be
evaluated to assess the state of platelet reactivity in patients with untreated
type 2 diabetes mellitus.