Abstract:
Polyoxometalates (POMs) are discrete anions and have got immense attraction in
biomedical research due to their structural diversity rendering them highly active
against viral, cancer, bacterial, and HIV infections. In this study 36 different hydrogel
formulations of Polyanion (P2W15) were prepared with four different cationic
polymers including gelatin, polyethyleneimine (PEI) and two water soluble chitosan
derivatives i.e. carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCh) and chitosan hydrochloride (ChCl).
For induction of pH responsiveness in prepared hydrogel formulations methacrylic
acid (MAA) and acrylic acid (AA) were grafted on polymer backbone. The swelling
and in–vitro dissolution experiments of prepared formulations were conducted at pH
1.2 and pH 7.4 showing maximum swelling and cumulative % in–vitro release at pH
7.4. Out of all 36 developed formulations, the maximum swelling and cumulative %
in–vitro release (92%) was observed for MAA–ChCl–POM hydrogel formulation
with sample ID CHCP6. Prepared hydrogels were physically cross–linked using
electrostatic interactions between POM and polycations that were further
characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR), thermal analysis (thermogravimetric analysis, (TGA),
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X–ray diffraction (XRD). FTIR
spectroscopy confirmed the interaction among different functional groups of polymer,
monomer and POM. Thermal properties of the prepared hydrogels were higher than
their individual components as suggested by TGA/DSC curves. The hydrogel
possessed glassy smooth surface morphology supporting an equal distribution of
POM throughout hydrogel network. Safety evaluation of the POM solution and oral
acute toxicity/tolerability of the hydrogel system (MAA–ChCl–POM) were also
conducted in rabbits using both male and female species. For oral tolerability/ acute
toxicity of hydrogel dispersion, maximal tolerated dose method was used suggesting
4000 mg/kg body weight dose as safe maximal tolerated dose (MTD).
Histopthological examinations of the rabbit‘s vital organs like heart, liver, kidney,
spleen and lungs showed no gross significant signs of toxicity. The findings of serum
xi
chemistry and haematological investigations confirmed that blood, liver and kidney
functions for both oral POM solution and hydrogel dispersion were normal except
reduction in blood glucose level which is due to inhibition of glucose–6–phosphatase
enzyme by POM. In-vitro cytotoxicity studies were also performed to check the
cytotoxic potential of the free as well as encapsulated POM (hydrogel) showing the
dose dependent cytotoxicity against two different cancer cell lines (MCF–7 and HeLa
cells) with minimal effects on normal cells (Vero). The highest in-vitro release
hydrogel formulation (sample ID CHCP6) was further selected for in–vivo evaluation
of POM for pharmacokinetic parameters through a validated and sensitive ion pair
HPLC method in rabbits. Kinetica 5.1 was used to determine the pharmacokinetic
profile of the POM. After oral administration of hydrogel disc having 20 mg POM,
relatively longer plasma concentration profiles were observed. Area under the curve
(AUC) and mean retention time (MRT) obtained for hydrogel formulation were 2.87
times and 1.91 times greater respectively than oral POM solution. Time for maximum
plasma concentration (Tmax) obtained for oral solution was 9.6 hours while for
hydrogel disc it was 14.6 hours. Half–life (t1/2) recorded for oral POM solution was 2
hours while in the case of hydrogel formulation, extended t1/2 of 4.87 hours was
observed. Apparent volume of distribution (Vz) obtained for oral POM solution was
0.003L while for hydrogel system that was 0.0038L. Clearance of oral POM solution
occurred at the rate of 0.0012 L/h while for hydrogel it was 0.00056 L/h. Elimination
half–life (Lz) observed for oral solution was 0.345 (hr) and that for the hydrogel
enclosed POM was 0.147 (hr). Cmax values calculated for oral POM solution and
hydrogel disc were lying in close proximity. The findings of the current study
indicated that prepared hydrogel system showed controlled encapsulated POM
release. The hydrogel system and concentration of POM used were safe from in–vivo
point of view. The cytototoxity data of normal Vero cells suggest that toxicity issue of
POMs can be addressed by closing it inside polymeric network and controlling its
release pattern.