Abstract:
The tobacco budworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) is one of the major insect pests of
many economically important crops and vegetables. It attacks more than 112 cultivated plants
species including cotton, maize, tobacco, groundnut, summer legumes and many vegetables. It
has developed high resistance against all type of insecticides including conventional and new
chemistry insecticides. Keeping in view the importance of this pest, experiments were conducted
to find out mechanism of resistance, cross resistance, stability and fitness cost of resistance of S.
litura against methoxyfenozide and spinosad.
To investigate the mechanism, cross resistance and stability of S. litura to
methoxyfenozide, a field collected population of S. litura selected with methoxyfenozide for
thirteen consecutive generations resulted in the development of 83.24 and 2358.6-fold resistance
to methoxyfenozide as compared to parental field population and susceptible laboratory
population, respectively. The outcomes of synergism studies revealed methoxyfenozide
resistance in S. litura to be monooxygenases (MO) mediated with high synergistic ratio (4.83)
with piperonyl butoxide (PBO), while S, S, S-tributyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF) showed no
synergism with methoxyfenozide (SR=1). This methoxyfenozide resistant strain showed a high
cross resistance to deltamethrin (28.82), abamectin (12.87) and little to emamectin benzoate
(2.36), however no cross resistance of methoxyfenozide and other tested insecticides was
recorded. The results depicted the methoxyfenozide resistance in S. litura to be unstable with
high reversion rate which decreased from 2358.6 to 163.9-fold (as compared to the susceptible
strain) when reared for five generations without any insecticidal exposure. The present research
supports the significance of MO-mediated metabolism in resistance to methoxyfenozide, which
demands some tactics to tackle this problem. The resistance against methoxyfenozide in S. litura
can be overcome by switching off its use for few generations or insecticides rotation having
different mode of action.
Similarly in order to investigate the mechanism of resistance, cross resistance and
stability of spinosad resistance to S. litura, a field collected population of S. litura was selected
with spinosad for eleven generations under controlled laboratory conditions. The resistance to
spinosad in S. litura increased 3921-fold (after eleven generations of selection with spinosad) as compared to a susceptible population of S. litura. No cross resistance between spinosad and
emamectin benzoate, methoxyfenozide, fipronil, indoxacarb, profenofos, lufenuron or
deltamethrin was found in the spinosad selected population of S. litura. To find the possible
mechanism of spinosad resistance in S. litura two synergists, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), S, S, S-
tributyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF) were tested on the susceptible and resistant strains and on the
un-selected field population. The values of the synergist ratios of PBO and DEF were 2.33 and
1.06 for the spinosad selected strain, 1.36 and 1.06 for the un-selected field population and 1.14
and 1.00 for the susceptible strain, respectively. As high PBO ratio indicates the role of
microsomal O-demethylase in causing spinosad resistance in S. litura. The spinosad resistant and
field populations of S. litura were reared without any selection pressure from the 12th to the 16th
generation (G12-G16). The spinosad resistance decreased from 3921 to 678 -fold in the spinosad
resistant population and from 31.1 to 15.1-fold in the un-selected population of S. litura as
compared to the susceptible strain. Spinosad resistance in S. litura has a high reversion rate
(−0.15) which indicates that spinosad resistance in S. litura is unstable and can be easily
managed by switching off the selection pressure for a few generations or alternating with
insecticides having different modes of action.
To find out the fitness cost and sub lethal effects of methoxyfenozide to S. litura, two
experiments were designed using the susceptible, field and methoxyfenozide resistant
populations of S. litura. The first experiment was conducted to find out the fitness cost of
methoxyfenozide resistance in a methoxyfenozide-resistant strain of S. litura for which a field
collected population of S. litura was selected with methoxyfenozide for thirteen consecutive
generations which resulted in the development of 83.0 and 2359-fold resistance to
methoxyfenozide as compared to the field and susceptible population of S. litura and showed a
fitness cost of 0.17 as compared to the susceptible strain of S. litura. In the second experiment
this susceptible strain was treated with methoxyfenozide by incorporating different concentration
levels of methoxyfenozide i.e. LC30, LC20 and LC10 into its artificial diet and feeding the 2nd
instar larvae on this treated diet for three days. The effects of different concentrations of
methoxyfenozide on the biological parameters of S. litura were determined. It was observed that
higher concentrations of methoxyfenozide significantly prolonged the development period of
larvae and pupae of S. litura as compared to the untreated control population. The larval
mortality was 28.00%, 19.00% and 10.00% at LC30, LC20 and LC10 levels of methoxyfenozide,
respectively. Similarly the pupal mortality recorded at LC30, LC20 and LC10 levels of
methoxyfenozide were 13.00%, 8.00% and 5.00%, respectively. Methoxyfenozide also showed a
significant effect on the adult longevity and survival. The number of eggs laid per female, egg
hatching, female ratio and the survival time of the adults of methoxy-treated groups were greatly
reduced as compared to the control population of S. litura. However the effects of
methoxyfenozide were greatly minimized in the next offspring generation of the methoxy-treated
parent generation of S. litura. The results clearly indicated that fitness cost of methoxyfenozide
and its sublethal effects on S. litura have an important impact on its population dynamics. Thus it
should be incorporated in the IPM program of S. litura in order to keep the pest population below
economic injury level.
Similarly in order to find the fitness cost and sub lethal effects of spinosad on S. litura,
experiments were conducted by using the susceptible, field and spinosad-resistant populations of
S. litura. The fitness cost of resistance to spinosad was determined in S. litura. The results of the
fitness study showed that the spinosad resistance in resistant strain of S. litura had a relatively
high fitness cost of 0.15 as compared to the susceptible strain. Furthermore the lethal and sub-
lethal effects of different concentrations of spinosad were checked on the susceptible strain at
different levels including LC40, LC30, LC20 and LC10, which revealed that the impact of spinosad
on the biological parameters of S. litura increased with the increase in concentrations of
spinosad. The results showed a significant impact of spinosad on the larval duration, pre-pupal
weight, pupal duration, pupal weight, No. of eggs per female and adult emergence etc. The
outcomes of the current research clearly indicate that fitness cost of spinosad and its sub-lethal
effects on S. litura have a significant impact on its population dynamics which can be
incorporated in the integrated pest management of S. litura.