Abstract:
The existence of the biraderies (Brotherhood, clans)1 in the social set up of
any society is an acknowledged fact. Biraderi politics are deeply impacted on the
societal setup, norms, and rituals and culture and politics of specific state if
agriculture based economy exists there. Even the rapid changes of the world and the
long time span do not affect the persisted nature of the biraderi system and the selfestablished
phenomenon rules over the lives of the members that undermine the
independence, free will and consequently affect the process of democratization.
The biraderi is the most predominant identity insignia in Pakistan.
The biraderi forms an imperative dynamic element in an individual‘s life, particularly
in the central parts of the Punjab. The analysis and evidence reveal that
the biraderi system has been one of the major factors influencing the democratic
process since the inception of Pakistan and the politics of biraderies is still playing an
important role in the economic and political life of Toba Tek Singh. In contemporary
Punjab the hierarchal structure, of the biraderi system is plainly breaking down to
some extent – but in political process the significance of biraderi politics has
augmented rather than declining in post-independence period that is primarily a
colonial product and the post-independence state continued to use the existing ‗overdeveloped‘
state structure that protected, projected, and entrenched the biraderies in
this system of power.
The historical, political junctures of colonial and post-colonial Punjab
discloses that in the milieu of Punjab, the study of biraderi politics has probable new
significance as it provides a rational model of manipulation of power
through biraderies. It postulates a state where biraderism is used by biraderies as a
tool of manipulation through social, economic, and political abstract power by which
to strive for control over scarce resources and the remains of colonial rule. In Punjab‘s political history this politico-sociological aspect has received little
attention. Biraderi politics, if ever studied, are only dealt with at a national level by
stressing the roles of bureaucratic, military elites and parliamentarians that
represented by the landed aristocrats.
The purpose of this study, therefore, is to analyse through an empirical method
that to what extent different following variation of the social, economic and
political dynamics of the biraderi politics create adherence in Punjab and thus
influence the process of democratization with particular reference to District Toba
Tek Singh.
1. Social dynamics; social structure like family, culture, occupation,
religion, education, status, titles, gender discrimination
2. Economic dynamics; Economic stability, Wealth, land, business, class
structure, dependence, employment
3. Political dynamics; Political participation, e.g. political awareness,
elections, voting behaviour, political parties.
This study is based on the hypothesis that the domination of biraderi politics is
affecting the process of democratization through its socioeconomic and political
manoeuvring and hence restricts an individual to take independent decisions. While
using the structured questionnaire tool, a survey was conducted in the 21 Union
Councils of the district Toba Tek Singh. Results show that dynamics
of biraderi politics played an important role in all social, economic, and political
aspect of individuals‘ life and his emancipating powers are pledged by
this biraderi system.; on the whole 70 to 80 % respondents had endorsed ―Biraderi
Politics Questionnaire” of this study and has shown that biraderi politics is affecting
the process of democratization. People are well aware of the biraderies ties and
evidently reflected their inclination to keep supporting the contesting candidates in the
future elections who affirm by their own relevant biraderies.
The biraderies, like Arains and Jatt, Sayyed and the native biraderies Kharral are
the dynamic biraderies of the District Toba Tek Singh those are dictating the
individuals to participate on the basis of biraderi prejudices or biraderism. And thus
they serve the higher strata of the biraderies by playing a non-democratic role. The
finding of the study is that the dynamics of biraderi politics are affecting the process of democratization and proving as an impediment in the process of institutionalizing
of democracy.