Abstract:
The current study aims to investigate the role of emotional problems in the context of
emotion related outcomes which includes emotional intelligence, empathy, regulation,
and expressivity. Further, in order to examine the relationship between emotional
problems and emotional outcomes, this study also aims to figure out the moderating role
of personality traits. For this purpose, a sample of (N = 1000) adolescents was enlisted
from different areas of the Punjab province (Pakistan) by using purposive sampling
technique. For data collection, Urdu version of the scales having determined
psychometric properties such as School Children Problem Scale, Big Five Personality
Inventory, Emotional Intelligence Scale, Emotional Empathy Scale, Emotional
Expressivity Scale, and Emotional Regulation Scale were used. Data was analyzed by
using SPSS software version-21. Descriptive statistics, simple linear regression and
hierarchical multiple regression were used for hypotheses testing. The findings of current
study revealed that emotional problems significantly negatively predicted emotional
intelligence (B = -.39, p < .01), emotional empathy (B = -.50, p < .01), emotional
regulation (B = -.43, p < .01), and emotional expressivity (B = -.36, p < .01). Moderated
multiple regression analysis revealed that personality traits did not play moderating role
between the emotional problems and emotional intelligence (p > .05). Neuroticism (B = -
.09, p < .01), openness to experience (B = -.18, p < .001) and conscientiousness (B = -
.11, p < .01) did not reveal any association among the variables. However, they have
played moderating role to determine the association between emotional problems and
emotional regulation. In addition, Neuroticism (B = -.12, p < .01) played moderating role
between the emotional problems and emotional empathy which has determined the link
between two variables. Moreover, no moderating role of personality trait was found
between emotional problems and emotional expressivity (p > .05). On the basis of gender
and institution, findings on demographic differences did not indicate any difference in (t
= 1.32, p > .05), socioeconomic status (t = 1.13, p > .05), family system (t = 1.27, p >
.05)(t = 1.08, p > .05), and emotional problems. However, results of residential status
(t = 2.34, p < .05) discovered that adolescents living in urban areas exhibited more
emotional problems than adolescents belonging to the rural areas.