Abstract:
Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) is a sucking pest of many
host plants and has become severe sucking pest of cotton in Pakistan by causing
quantitative and qualitative losses. Resistance levels to pyrethroids such as bifenthrin,
deltamethrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin were medium, tolerance to low resistance, and
tolerance to low resistance to medium, respectively compared with Lab-PK. The
organophosphate insecticides profenofos and triazophos exhibited medium and tolerance
to low resistance to medium, respectively compared with Lab-PK. Five novel chemistry
insecticides showed the RR in range of tolerance to low resistance against emamectin
benzoate, tolerance to low resistance to medium in spinosad, medium to high in
chlorfenapyr, medium in imidacloprid and tolerance to low resistance to medium in
nitenpyram.
Genetic basis of chlorfenapyr resistance in O. hyalinipennis were also explored by
selecting the population for continuous six generations. The selection resulted in 149.06
fold resistance in O. hyalinipennis. Chlorfenapyr resistance in O. hyalinipennis was
autosomal, incompletely dominant and polygenic. Synergism bioassays with PBO and
DEF revealed chlorfenapyr resistance might be due to esterase activity.
To determine if synergism occurs between organophosphate, pyrethroid, carbamate
and new chemical insecticides, representative compounds of these groups were tested
(cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, methomyl, acetamiprid, fipronil and spirotetramat) in a 1:1
and LC50:LC50 ratio against O. hyalinipennis. Cypermethrin combined with methomyl and
spirotetramat, methomyl with spirotetramat, acetamiprid with spirotetramat and fipronil
with spirotetramat had synergistic effects (CI ˂ 1) in a Lab-PK. Methomyl combined with acetamiprid and acetamiprid with fipronil had synergistic effects on a Field-POP.
Cypermethrin combined with methomyl and spirotetramat, chlorpyrifos with methomyl,
acetamiprid and spirotetramat, methomyl with acetamiprid and spirotetramat and fipronil
with spirotetramat also had synergistic effects on a Field-POP. Enzyme inhibitors PBO and
DEF significantly increased the toxicity of chlorpyrifos, methomyl, acetamiprid and
spirotetramat to a Field-POP, suggesting a monooxygenase and esterase based resistance
mechanisms. However fipronil did not synergise with PBO and DEF.
Stability and cross-resistance in a laboratory selected field strain of O.
hyalinipennis were also studied. The Chlorfenapyr-SEL population (149.06-fold) showed
limited cross-resistance to bifenthrin, triazophos, fipronil, and emamectin benzoate.
Resistance to chlorfenapyr was also unstable as a result of removal of selection pressure
for further five generations. The toxicity of chlorfenapyr was significantly greater
compared to bifenthrin when tested on a field population (Field-POP) and an unselected
population (UNSEL-POP) whereas the toxicity of chlorfenapyr was significantly lower
than that of triazophos when tested on a chlorfenapyr selected population at generation 7.
Chlorfenapyr toxicity was statistically similar to bifenthrin, triazophos, fipronil and
emamectin benzoate when tested on Field-POP, UNSEL-POP and Chlorfenapyr-SEL (G7).
A field population of O. hyalinipennis from Punjab, Pakistan showed medium resistance
to chlorfenapyr, bifenthrin, triazophos but tolerance to low resistance was found against
fipronil and emamectin benzoate, compared with the Lab-PK population.
Regular assessment of resistance to insecticides and integrated management plans
like judicious use of insecticides and rotation of insecticides along with different modes of
action are required to delay resistance development in O. hyalinipennis.