Abstract:
This study examines the role of Pakistan Peoples Party in the politics of Pakistan from
1988 to 1999. The party contributed towards the restoration of democracy after a constant
struggle against the dictatorship which ruled over the country for more than a decade
(1977 to 1988). PPP, under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto ruled Pakistan twice, though
with a simple majority each time in the parliament. Benazir started as a prime minister
with great enthusiasm as evident from initiatives that were to bring a change in different
aspects of the national life. Social Action Program to improve the living standard of
common man, lifting of ban on trade unions, guarantee the freedom of press and
conversion of death sentence into life imprisonment were some of the praiseworthy steps
of her government. While in government twice she tried to improve relationship with
International Community particularly with India. The expectation could, however, only
marginally materialized on the account of the confrontation in which her government
indulged with the opposition. Several challenges like (hostility with IJI in the Punjab,
MQM in Sindh, the Army and the President) obstructed the smooth functioning of PPP
rule on both occasions. Despite these challenges, the party should have played the game
of politics according to rules and to materialize its pledges made with the masses. Apart
from these, the mishandling of government resource, nepotism and favoritism
overshadowed issues of vital significance. While choosing to sit on the opposition
benches, Benazir Bhutto followed a healthy tradition of accepting the mandate of ruling
Pakistan Muslim League. But PPP’s role as the main opposition platform was dominated
more by the elements of hatred and revenge rather than cooperation. Benazir wasted her
energies in skirmishing with her political rivals and with other state institutions such as
the military and judiciary. Ethnic troubles provoking law and order in Sindh on both
occasions of the PPP rule posed serious threats to its survival. This virtually rendered
those efforts ineffective which the PPP could use for democracy and development. The
study concludes that despite the follies made, PPP has the credit of bringing democracy
back to the country. Mostly qualitative tools are used to determine various dimensions
and depths of this study. Both historical and descriptive methods are used looking to the
nature of the study. In order to collect the relevant information, both primary and
secondary sources were used.