Abstract:
The study attempted to bring to light principals’ interventions for school effectiveness at the
Government Secondary School level. The objectives of the study were to explore the current
interventional role of government girls’ high school principals for identification of their
strengths and weaknesses and to make recommendations for improving their interventional
role
for
school
effectiveness.
The
population
of
the
study
included
18
principals/headmistresses of government girls’ high schools, 270 senior teachers and all the
04 district level education officers (female). Of those 18 (100%) principals/headmistresses
and 04(100%) female district level education officers were included in the sample. Moreover,
90 (33.3%) senior teachers were randomly selected for sampling reason being that total
population of teachers could not be covered. The primary data were collected through
structured interviews asked from female district level education officers. The interviews were
based on 07 questions. An opionionnaire containing thirty-eight statements was handed over
to principals and senior teachers. The relevant literature was reviewed, which provided
indicators for development of tools. The data obtained were quantified and described. In
order to measure the internal reliability of the opionionnaire, Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability
Test was applied for estimating the reliability of the data. The value of Cronbach Alpha was
0.89, which indicated a high level of internal reliability. The Chi-Square Test of Association
was also applied for checking the results to show association between the categories of
principals’ and teachers’ statements. It showed that there were no significant differences in
the responses of both principals’ and teachers’. The results revealed that principals could play
more effective role for school effectiveness by developing clear vision; providing
instructional feedback to teachers; effective monitoring and supervisory mechanism; setting a
democratic environment conducive to teaching learning process and involving the
stakeholders in decision- making. The results of the study further indicated that school
effectiveness owed itself to capable principals, committed staff, non-political intervention, a
procedure of incentives and disincentives, positive feedback to teachers and last, but not the
least, a continuous instructional supervision to what happened in classroom.
The
recommendations for improving interventional role of principals required instructional
supervision, commitment of teachers to the teaching profession and improved pedagogical
skills of teachers as well as updating their own administrative and managerial skills.