Abstract:
This base line as well as comprehensive study about the productive potential of grasses in
Cholistan desert was conducted for two consecutive years from 2009 to 2010. The aim of
this study was to study the floristic composition, vegetation structure, biomass production,
carrying capacity, palatability and nutritional evaluation of grass species. Based on our
findings, total 27 grass species consisting of 16 genera, belonging to family Poaceae were
identified. The documented grasses comprised of 13 annuals species and 14 perennials
species whereas therophyte was dominant life form including 16 grass species followed by
hemicrytophytes with 09 species and phanerophytes with 02 species. Abundance of grasses
showed that 06 grass species were found very common, 14 were common and 07 species
were rare. In current study, two phenological seasons were recognized from the Cholistan
desert. First season started from February and ended in May while second phenological
season was from August to December. Maximum grass species were found to be flowering
during the second spell as compare to first one. Further, based on economic use
classification it was observed that all 27 grasses were being used as fodder/forage while 05
species were used as medicine in the investigated area. Based on phytosociological study,
twenty grass communities were identified from selected range sites. However, multivariate
analysis has produce three major vegetation groups i.e. interdunal, sandunal and clayey
saline group. The soil texture of sandunal group was sandy, interdunal group was sandy
loam whereas clayey saline group was clayey. Moreover, it was observed that fluctuations
in rainfall pattern influenced the biomass productivity of range grasses in the study area.
There was high biomass production in wet season (8068 Kg/ha) as compared to dry season
(5595 Kg/ha). Following the biomass productivity of grasses, overall carrying capacity of
rangelands of Cholistan desert was 24.20 ha/AU/year during dry season and 17.25
ha/AU/year in wet season. However, stocking rate varied from 0.041 AU/ha/year in dry
season to 0.057AU/ha/year in wet season. In this study, degree of palatability showed that
all the identified grass species were palatable. Out of which 18 grass species were highly
palatable while 07 were moderately palatable and 02 were less palatable species. Among 27
palatable grass species 25 species (92.6%) were used by goats, 26 species (96.3%) were
used by sheep and cattle, and camel were using only 07 grass species (25.9 %). It was noted
that flower and fruit parts of grasses were grazed in 14 species (51.8 %) and 08 species
(29.8 %) respectively, whereas in 26 species (96.3%) leaves were used and in 23 species
(85.1%) stem parts were grazed. Similarly, nutritional evaluation consisting of chemical,
structural, and mineral analysis of major range grasses was conducted. Results showed that
grasses were good source of dry matter and crude protein but deficient in other nutrients and
remained fail to meet the animal requirements for optimum livestock production in
Cholistan rangelands. Overall, this study showed that the investigated rangeland is less
productive and needs proper management and rehabilitation through ecological approaches.
There is a need that Government should give complete protection to this rangeland and
provide alternate resource of energy to lessen the burden on this area. It is recommended
that low stocking rate during growing seasons and moderate stocking rate during dry spell
by proper livestock management technique improve range biomass, species diversity, and
rangeland carrying capacity. This all would be possible with the participation of local
people/pastoralist and Government to make the resources sustainable.