Abstract:
In modern world due to multi-functional requirements and architectural constraints, the transfer
structures in low to moderate seismic zones are being used. However, the suitable modeling
options and modification factors to account the true behavior of these types of structures need to
be investigated in high seismic zones. In this study, a small prototype simply supported beam
having shear span to depth ratio of less than 2 has been first designed manually using strut and
tie approach and then modeled using different modeling techniques such as non-linear shell
layered, area element, solid element, line element and strut and tie method (STM), available in
commercial software’s. The cracking pattern, stress and strain distribution obtained from the
different FEM modeling technique have been compared with experimental studies in the
literature and on the basis of the results obtained, non-linear shell layered is selected as reference
model. All other models are modified to approximately align with reference model in respect of
mid span deflection. To account for the effect of cracking on stiffness, the modulus of elasticity
and shear modulus of concrete is reduced by 20% in case of frame/line element. For shell/area
element, moment of inertia is reduced by 35% of its gross value. For solid element, the modulus
of elasticity and shear modulus of concrete is reduced by 40%. Whereas in case of STM, no
stiffness modification factors are used. The findings of the small prototype are used in modeling
transfer girders (TGs) in 11-storied building. The transfer girder (TG) is given at ground level
and the building is founded on soil profile type-SD and located in seismic zone-04. The cracks
pattern, stress and strain distribution, storey shear, overturning moments and deflections are
worked out using gravity and seismic load combinations using equivalent static procedure. These
parameters from each model have been compared with those obtained from the reference model
in order to rank the modeling techniques. Based on this comparison, it is found that STM, thick
shell, solid and line element are better modeling techniques in order of preference starting from
STM. On the basis of the building performance in this study, it is confidently recommended the
use of TGs in severe seismic zone-04. This research will help practicing engineers to select the
best modeling technique for modeling of TG in mix use building structures.